DACCORD
www.hcg.nl/daccord

Development and Application of
Co-ordinated Control of Corridors

Project TR 1017

Telematics Applications Programme
TRANSPORT

 

Title : Off-Line Simulation Results
Author(s) : Haj Salem H. (INRETS)
Mangeas, M. (INRETS)
Co-Author(s) : Young, P. (ULANC)
Taylor, J. (ULANC)
Pavlis Y. TUC)
Kotsialos, A. (TUC)
Papageorgiou M. (TUC)
Toorenburg, J.A.C. van (TRANSPUTE)
Middelham, F. (RWS-AVV)
Muste, R. (RWS-AVV)
Westerman, M (TNO-INRO)
Deliverable No. : D06.3
Version : 2.0
Contract Date : August 1998
Submission Date : March 31, 1999
Dissemination Level : PU ¾ Public Usage
Deliverable Nature : RE ¾ Report
Deliverable Type : PD ¾ Programme Deliverable
Project Coordinator : Hague Consulting Group (HCG)
Contact Person : Eric Kroes
Address : Surinamestraat 4
2585 GJ Den Haag
The Netherlands
Telephone : +31-70-3469426
Fax : +31-70-3464420
Consortium : HCG, CSST, INRETS, TUC, TNO-TPD, AINE
CWI, RWS-NH, TUD, ULANC, UNA, SIER, SRILOG, VP, AVE, CELCIUS, DRA, RWS-AVV, TECHN,
TNO-INRO, ASM, MIZAR

 

Table of Contents

1. Introduction and Framework

1.1 The DACCORD Project
1.2 Objectives of the DACCORD Project

1.3 Background
1.4 Objectives of Work Package 6

1.5 Objectives of Deliverable D06.3
1.6 Structure of this Deliverable

2. WP06: Co-ordinated Control for Dynamic Traffic Management

2.1 Relationship with Work Package WP04
2.2 Overview of the Control Strategies in DACCORD

2.2.1 Point, Link, and Network Level Control
2.2.2 Tactical and Strategic Approaches

2.3 The DACCORD Test Sites

3. Point Level : Motorway to Motorway control

3.1 The Paris Test Site (Appendix A)

3.1.1 Barrier Devices Modelling
3.1.2 Simulation Tests

3.1.3 Conclusion

3.2 The Amsterdam test site (Appendix B)

4. Link Level: Co-ordinated ramp metering

4.1 Co-ordinated ramp metering control by non-minimal state variable feedback (Appendix D)

4.1.1 The PIP-LQ algorithm for co-ordinated ramp metering
4.1.2 Simulation results
4.1.3 Conclusion

4.2 Co-ordinated ramp metering with METALINE (Appendix C)

5. Integrated Network level control

5.1 Brief Description of the Integrated Control Approach
5.2 OASIS Control Strategy (Appendix E)

5.2.1 Brief Test Site Description
5.2.2 Conclusions

5.3 The AMOC Control Strategy (Appendix F)
5.4 Simple Decentralised Feedback Strategies for Route Guidance in Traffic Networks (Appendix G)

6. CONCLUSIONS

7. Bibliography

8. Glossary

 

Appendix A: MTMC: Results of Simulation Studies on the France test site

Appendix B: "Motorway to Motorway Control: A model based study on the A10-North before the Coentunnel"

Appendix C: Design and Simulation Test of Coordinated ramp Metering METALINE for A10-West

Appendix D: Co-ordinated Ramp Metering by Non-minimal State Variable Feedback : Simulation Study

Appendix E: OASIS : OFF-LINE SIMULATION RESULTS

Appendix F: AMOC Off-line Simulation Results

Appendix G: Simple Decentralized Feedback Strategies for Route Guidance in Traffic Networks

Appendix H: The Mock-up BOSS; A Prototype Decision Support System - PDSS (The functional design)

Appendix H: The Mock-up BOSS; A Prototype Decision Support System - PDSS (The functional design)

Appendix I: METANET Application to the Amsterdam Motorway network

Appendix J: simulation of a routing control algorithm for motorway networks

 

Technical Abstract

Deliverable D06.3 is a result of Work Package WP06 of the DACCORD project, namely
Co-ordinated Control for Dynamic Traffic Management Systems. In deliverable D06.1, the DACCORD control strategies are described in detail, while deliverable D06.2 is concerned with the software developed for on-line implementation. The present deliverable D06.3 discusses the tuning, testing and evaluation of the DACCORD control strategies, utilising various off-line simulation tools.

This document describes the simulation results for the following control strategies:

bulletMotorway-to-motorway control.
bulletCo-ordinated ramp metering.
bulletNetwork level co-ordinated ramp metering.
bulletAdvanced routing control.
bulletIntegrated motorway network control.

The results for each of these control measures are briefly discussed in the present report, while the full details are presented in the associated appendices.

 

Executive Summary

This document is deliverable D06.3 of the Transport Telematics project DACCORD (Development and Application of Co-ordinated Control of Corridors). The DACCORD project aims to design, implement and validate a practical Dynamic Traffic Management System (DTMS) for integrated and co-ordinated control of inter-urban corridors.

The document reports on the off-line simulation work performed within Work Package WP06, Co-ordinated Control for Dynamic Traffic Management Systems.

Within DACCORD, the term co-ordinated control refers to the co-operation of the control measures within one particular category (such as ramp metering) towards a common objective, while the term integrated control refers to the co-operation of all the various traffic control measures towards a common objective.

Objectives of Work Package WP06

The objective of WP06 is to develop generic, co-ordinated control tools for periurban traffic networks and to apply them to the DACCORD test sites. The control measures concerned include ramp metering, motorway-to-motorway control, VMS, VDS and route guidance.

Work Package WP06 encompasses the following three deliverables:

Deliverable D06.1 : Co-ordinated control strategies.
Deliverable D06.2 : Co-ordinated control software.
Deliverable D06.3 : Off-line simulation results.

Objectives of Deliverable D06.3

The objective of the present deliverable D06.3, is to utilise off-line simulation tools to implement, test and evaluate the various DACCORD control strategies. These control strategies include:

bulletMotorway-to-motorway control.
bulletCo-ordinated ramp metering.
bulletNetwork level co-ordinated ramp metering.
bulletAdvanced routing control.
bulletIntegrated motorway network control.

The off-line simulation results are summarised in the main part of this deliverable, while full details are presented in the corresponding appendices. The contents of these appendices are discussed below:

Appendices A and B are dedicated to point control strategies and, in particular, to Motorway-To-Motorway Control (MTMC). The development of MTMC, together with an investigation of its impact on traffic at the French and Dutch test sites is described. In order to evaluate the impact of such control action on the traffic conditions of the Paris test site, variants of the well known traffic responsive ramp metering control strategy ALINEA have been implemented on the A6a entrance to the BPI using two possible control devices: signal lights and barriers.

In Appendices C and D, various centralised co-ordinated ramp metering strategies for the Amsterdam A10-West are assessed. Note that Appendix C is a EUROCOR deliverable provided for background information, while Appendix D presents the results of novel DACCORD sponsored research.

Appendices E and F discuss integrated control strategies based on non-linear optimisation. The methodology employed is generic in nature and yields both co-ordinated and integrated control strategies. In this work, the traffic flow models utilised are the METACOR and METANET simulations. The optimisation algorithm for obtaining optimal control trajectories, together with the traffic flow model, form part of generic control software tools called OASIS (Optimal Advanced control System for Integrated Strategies) and AMOC (Advanced Motorway Optimal Control). Both tools calculate optimal control trajectories for a combination of control measures (VMS and/or ramp metering and/or motorway to motorway control) for motorway networks of arbitrary topology. Note that AMOC differs from OASIS in that the latter does not include routing control.

This is followed, in Appendix G, by consideration of simple decentralised feedback strategies for route guidance, together with the associated off-line simulation results. Appendix H discusses a mock up of the BOSS system.

In version 2.0 of this documents some additional work has been included. Appendix I presents the application of METANET to the Amsterdam Motorway Network, and finally, appendix J presents the simulation results of a routing control algorithm for Motorway Networks.